Strongman
Find the strengths worth building on.
Four AI perspectives on your next decision. Grounded in your spec, SWOT, and available market evidence.
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Give each a voice.
Find the strengths worth building on.
Challenge the assumptions behind the plan.
Look for unmet needs and new openings.
Spot threats and consider a response.
Your spec, SWOT, competitor research, and earlier discussions inform the answer.
One brief. Four independent answers, each from a different perspective.
Enable market intelligence for cited public evidence. Unverified claims are identified as gaps.
Record the choice, the assumption, and how you will test it. Set a date to look again.
See what is due for review. Bring new evidence back to the board.
Bring SWOT insights and competitor signals into the same conversation.
Explore Live SWOTFollow relevant companies, inspect the sources, and bring changes to Spec for review.
Explore CompetitionSchedule reviews. Choose separately whether to refresh market intelligence.
Choose a cadence and time zone. See what changed.
Optional refreshes of Competition and SWOT. Off by default; uses AI credits when enabled.
Open the review in your Inbox. Email is opt-in.

Cofounder advises; your team decides. It never edits the specification, and its board is AI, not a panel of people. Board runs spend AI credits, and market intelligence stays off until you switch it on. It is a sharper way to think out loud, not an oracle.
Cofounder is a strategy board inside every CrystalSpec project. You ask a product or business question, and four AI perspectives — Strongman, Attacker, Scout, and Watchdog — answer it from your specification, your Live SWOT, your competitor research, and earlier board discussions. You can turn the advice into decisions with a test plan and a revisit date.
No. It is a structured second opinion that has read everything in your project and is never too busy to argue. Decisions stay with your team; the board advises, records, and reassesses when you bring it evidence.
No. Board discussions and decisions live beside the specification and never edit it. Changes to the spec still go through AI proposals that a person approves.
From the project's Competition and Live SWOT tools, and, when market intelligence is switched on, from current public sources the board cites in its answer. When evidence can't be verified, the board states the gap rather than claiming it checked the market.
Anyone who can read the project can read the board. Members with write access ask questions, record decisions, and configure the schedule. Board runs use your workspace's AI credits, and scheduled market intelligence stays off until you switch it on.
Cofounder ships in every CrystalSpec project, next to the spec it reads.